Tuesday, July 26, 2005

Skirmish Over a Query About Roberts's Faith

Congressional Republicans warned Democrats on Monday not to make Judge John G. Roberts's Roman Catholic faith an issue in his confirmation hearings for a seat on the Supreme Court, reviving a politically potent theme from previous battles over judicial appointees.

The subject came up after reports about a meeting on Friday at which Senator Richard J. Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, is said to have asked Judge Roberts whether he had thought about potential conflicts between the imperatives of their shared Catholic faith and of the civil law. The discussion was described by two officials who spoke anonymously because the meeting was confidential and by a Republican senator who was briefed on their conversation.

Judge Roberts responded that his personal views would not color his judicial thinking, all three said, just as he has testified in the past.

An opinion-page article in The Los Angeles Times on Monday by Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor, included an account of Mr. Durbin's question. Professor Turley cited unnamed sources saying that Judge Roberts had told Mr. Durbin he would recuse himself from cases involving abortion, the death penalty or other subjects where Catholic teaching and civil law can clash.

If that is true why bother putting him on the court?

Is religion a valid issue when it comes to a Supreme Court nominee? Should it be?

1 Comments:

At 8:15 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The job of the Supreme Court is to interpret the law, not to make law. In that capacity, religion should have no bearing whatsoever on who is in that position. Also, left or right leaning should have no bearing on who is on the court. But, then again, I believe in truth, justice and the American way (the way it was meant to be), unlike some in the government.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home