Wednesday, June 07, 2006

Did Ann Coulter cross the line or did she hit the nail on the head?


In her new book, conservative flame-thrower Ann Coulter slams the 9/11 widows who have been critical of the Bush administration. She writes: "These self-obsessed women seem genuinely unaware that 9-11 was an attack on our nation and acted like as if the terrorist attack only happened to them. They believe the entire country was required to marinate in their exquisite personal agony. Apparently, denouncing Bush was part of the closure process. These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-parrazis. I have never seen people enjoying their husband's death so much."

1 Comments:

At 10:10 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

So she's a bit harsh....and your point is....what?

I didn't know she was on Bush's payroll. Can you show me the evidence you have of that?

Did you read her book or listen to everything she said to Matt Lauer. Everyone ignores the fact that she specifically named 4 women who use their status as widows of husbands who died on 9/11 for political purposes. Once you jump in the political arena, anything goes. These women are members of a specific group called "The Jersey Girls" who are politically active in denouncing Bush. They also appeared in campaign commercials for John Kerry when he was running for president. Therefore, they are not immune to opposing arguments and attacks.

Cindy Sheehan, a previous exploit of the left, was exposed for the tree huggin' freak she is. These women are also to be exposed as they are indeed ENJOYING their husbands deaths through the charity they have received. These women are now in a higher income bracket due to their husband's deaths. To go on with their lives would mean turning off the faucet of cash. So yes, they are enjoying their husband's deaths.

Budd Heddinger hung up on me yesterday on his show. I called in to comment on his topic: "Cage Match: Hillary vs. Coulter". It was a proud moment I had been waiting for given that I have a 75% disagreeance rate with his goody-two-shoes, holier than thou, but there's not enough room for me and the gators/manatees so let's just kill them all. He said I don't have a heart. (A) Those broads are greedy. Do your research first before you report, don't be like Dan Rather. (B) You don't know me. You don't know my background and research in psychology and social work or that I was a family services worker in NYC after 9/11, to which I also did my masters thesis on regarding PTSD and compassion fatigue. (C) If you put the twinkies down and learned some personal responsibility you wouldn't need the "Bud Scan" and there'd be plenty of room for you and all of God's creatures on this earth (have a heart). And (D) if you reff'd the cage match between Hillary and Coulter you wouldn't be "crying foul" you'd get KTFO!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home