Saturday, December 24, 2005

EXCLUSIVE: Nuclear Monitoring of Muslims Done Without Search Warrants

In search of a terrorist nuclear bomb, the federal government since 9/11 has run a far-reaching, top secret program to monitor radiation levels at over a hundred Muslim sites in the Washington, D.C., area, including mosques, homes, businesses, and warehouses, plus similar sites in at least five other cities, U.S. News has learned. In numerous cases, the monitoring required investigators to go on to the property under surveillance, although no search warrants or court orders were ever obtained, according to those with knowledge of the program. Some participants were threatened with loss of their jobs when they questioned the legality of the operation, according to these accounts.

And this is a problem because? I want my government monitoring these sites. The enemy is within and they don't wish us well. We ignore them at our own peril! Why are we telling the enemy what were doing to monitor them? Whose side is U.S. News and World Report on anyway?

6 Comments:

At 12:53 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

As I understand it, they went into those areas which are open to the public, such as the portions of the mosque which are open to worshippers. I have no problem with investigators walking around inside the public areas of mosques with hidden radiation detectors. Our professed enemies use these places as refuges and martialing areas. It's reasonable to look for them where they tend to go.

 
At 5:45 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The U.S. Air Force and other agencies have deployed Nuclear Emergency Search Teams (NEST) throughout the Northeast corridor and other sensitive areas. It is amazing what an actual briefcase can conceal. F.D.R. had it correct; Internment of potential spies, subversives, and other undesirables to help win the war.

 
At 12:26 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

All that internment produced no intelligence at all. It simply put thousands of loyal Japanese Americans into concentration camps. In spite of that horrible treatment they still remained loyal, which proves they were never a threat in the first place. Not to mention the thousands of first class Japanese Americans who voluntered to fight the Japanese in the war effort. "Internment of potential spies, subversives,and other undesirables" was the policy of the Gestapo as well as Stalin's secret police. Watch out some day you might be on that list, the political wind can change. No president should ever hold that power or think he is above the law.

 
At 1:03 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

How is the Constitution preserved when it's ideals are thrown out the window. As I said internment produced no viable intelligence that led to any arrests of real enemies. And like I said political winds change you could be the target some day. It is always politics, what country do you live in? The national skincolor has gone from lily white to brown, you could be seen as the enemy some day.

 
At 2:37 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"
How is the Constitution preserved when it's ideals are thrown out the window. As I said internment produced no viable intelligence that led to any arrests
of real enemies. And like I said political winds change you could be the target some day. It is always politics, what country do you live in? The national
skincolor has gone from lily white to brown, you could be seen as the enemy some day."

." VDARE.COM - printer-friendly article

VDARE.COM - http://www.vdare.com/roberts/harvard_genocide.htm

September 04, 2002

Harvard Hates The White Race?

By
Paul Craig Roberts

Is the multicultural campaign really about diversity? Or is it about stamping out Western civilization and the “white race” itself?

College students will tell you that a
university education
today is a
guilt
trip for whites. The purpose is to prevent whites from appreciating and absorbing
their own culture
and to make it difficult for whites to resist the unreasonable demands (quotas, reparations, etc.) from “people of color.”

To the questions, “who am I, what am I,” the white university graduate answers:
“a racist, sexist, homophobic oppressor.”

Neither parents, trustees, alumni, nor the public are aware of the anti-white propaganda that masquerades as education. When someone who is aware tells
them, they think the person is exaggerating in order to make a point.

Now comes Harvard educated Noel Ignatiev, an academic at Harvard’s
W.E.B. DuBois Institute for African-American Research.
Dr. Ignatiev is the founder of a journal,
Race Traitor,
which has as its motto,
“treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.”

The journal’s purpose is “to abolish the white race.”

At the least, Dr. Ignatiev intends cultural and psychological genocide for whites. It is unclear whether physical extermination is part of the program.
A statement by the editors on the web site says that the new abolitionists

“do not limit themselves to socially acceptable means of protest, but reject in advance no means of attaining their goal.”

Dr. Ignatiev does not believe his agenda is controversial. He writes:

“The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from
committed white supremacists.” Thus does he put whites on notice. If they oppose their abolition, they are
“white supremacists.”

According to Dr. Ignatiev,

“The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race.”

“Make no mistake about it,” he says,

“we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed--not
‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.”

What “social construct” will be left? A black one? An Hispanic one? Muslim? Asian? What about Jewish?

The Washington Times
reports
that Dr. Ignatiev is himself Jewish. If Jewish intellectuals and Israeli political leaders can be believed, Jews have a cultural and racial consciousness.
Israel is the
Jewish homeland,
and Israelis seem determined to
keep it that way.
Can anyone imagine a gentile at an Israeli university founding a magazine devoted to abolishing the Jewish race?

Yet, Dr. Ignatiev believes that it is self-evident that whites in their homelands should be abolished.

Where did he get this view? His only education was at
Harvard
where he received two graduate degrees.

Is Harvard embarrassed? No. Dr. Ignatiev [
ignatiev@fas.harvard.edu]
is showcased in the current issue of
Harvard Magazine.
Getting rid of whiteness is not controversial at Harvard, because it is the business of American universities.

A white skin, you see, is a mark of
privilege.
It is not the privilege of being admitted to Harvard even though you don’t meet the entrance requirements. It is not the privilege of being hired independently
of ability because of government enforced
racial quotas.
It is not the privilege of being able to
sue
whites and
“white companies”
if blacks are not proportionately represented in the work force. It is not the privilege of being able to call whites every name in the book and sue if
a white replies in kind.

The privilege of being white is that whites can secretly believe they are superior and, as long as they don’t mention it, be loyal to the white race.

“The white race is like a private club,” says Dr. Ignatiev.

I am sure Dr. Ignatiev is well-informed, but I see no signs of this white loyalty. Most of the
multiculturalists
and
radical feminists
are white. Whites disadvantaged whites by imposing racial quotas. Despite widespread opposition to quotas,
neither
“white” political party will act to stop unconstitutional quotas, which have made a mockery of
equality under law.
Whites are
inundated
by massive non-white immigration, and neither “white” political party will act to restrain immigration. To the contrary, both parties pander to the immigrants.

But Dr. Ignatiev has an idea like Hitler. A race is guilty and must go. The
communists said
it was a guilty class that had to go.

If you thought genocide was left behind in the 20th century, be apprised that today genocide has a home in the educational system.

Paul Craig Roberts is the co-author with Lawrence M. Stratton of
The Tyranny of Good Intentions: How Prosecutors and Bureaucrats Are Trampling the Constitution in the Name of Justice"

 
At 3:13 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

And that is why internment must be opposed at all times.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home